Comparison

Orbis IO vs Geotab: OEM-native data vs hardware telematics.

Geotab is the global market leader in fleet telematics. It does what it does well, on a scale Orbis IO does not currently approach. The reason fleet operators evaluate the two together is not that they overlap on every feature — they don't — but that they offer fundamentally different answers to the same underlying question: how do I get accurate, defensible data about what my vehicles are doing? This page sets out the architectural difference, where each is strongest, and which buyer fits which.

The core difference, upfront

Geotab reads vehicle data via a hardware OBD dongle plugged into the vehicle's onboard diagnostic port. The dongle captures GPS location, speed, accelerometer events, engine RPM and a derived approximation of fuel consumption from the OBD-II protocol. The data is sent over a cellular connection to Geotab's cloud platform, where the analytics layer interprets it.

Orbis IO reads vehicle data via the manufacturer's connected-car APIs — the same systems the vehicle's own dashboard, smartphone app and connected services use. There is no hardware in the vehicle. Actual fuel consumption, battery state-of-charge, charging session history, real driver behaviour metrics, predictive maintenance signals — all of it comes directly from the vehicle's own onboard computer, not approximated from OBD-II signals.

Everything that follows about where each platform wins flows from this one architectural difference.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGeotabOrbis IO
Data sourceOBD dongle (hardware)OEM manufacturer APIs (no hardware)
Hardware installation requiredYes — per vehicleNo
Vehicle coverageAny vehicle with an OBD-II port14+ OEM brands via API
Real-time GPS trackingYes — second-by-secondPeriodic (manufacturer-defined)
Dashcam integrationYesNo
Route optimisationYes — first-class featureNo
Real fuel consumptionEstimated from OBD signalsDirect from vehicle's onboard computer
PHEV battery state-of-chargeLimited (OBD-protocol dependent)Yes — from OEM API
EV charging session historyLimited / not nativeYes — from OEM API
DVLA-integrated driver licence checksVia partner integrationsNative
MOT and tax trackingVia partner integrationsNative
SECR carbon reporting from real consumptionFrom estimated fuel dataFrom actual fuel/energy data
PricingPer-vehicle, hardware + subscription, quote-basedFrom £2/driver/month (Compliance), £15/vehicle/month (Intelligence)

Where Geotab wins

Geotab's strengths follow from the hardware-telematics architecture, and they are real and substantial.

Universal vehicle coverage. Any vehicle built since 1996 has an OBD-II port. Geotab works on all of them — fleet cars, vans, HGVs, mixed marques, vehicles from manufacturers Orbis does not yet support, vehicles too old for connected-car APIs. For a fleet running mixed-age, mixed-marque vehicles, this is a procurement-level advantage.

Real-time GPS tracking. Geotab samples GPS location continuously and feeds it to the platform in near-real-time. For dispatch, route management, lone-worker safety, asset recovery and second-by-second event analysis, this is what Geotab is built for. OEM APIs do not currently deliver second-resolution real-time location at fleet scale.

Dashcam, video and integrated safety hardware. Geotab's hardware ecosystem extends into dashcams, driver-facing cameras and the analytics layer behind them. For fleets where video evidence in incident management is a hard requirement, Geotab is built for the job; Orbis is not.

Route optimisation and dispatch workflows. Geotab's mature route optimisation, dispatch tooling and stop-sequencing features are the result of many years of investment. Orbis does not offer native route optimisation.

Established enterprise procurement. Geotab is the global market leader, with the procurement track record, enterprise integrations and reseller channel that come with that position. For a large fleet making a multi-year procurement decision, Geotab is a low-risk choice with a known answer.

Where Orbis wins

Orbis's structural advantages flow from reading manufacturer data directly, not approximating it through an OBD dongle.

No hardware cost or installation. Orbis deployment is API integration, days rather than weeks. There is no per-vehicle hardware capital cost; no dongle to install, replace, or maintain; no firmware lifecycle to manage. For a 100-vehicle fleet, the capital cost difference on the hardware line alone is significant.

OEM-grade data accuracy on fuel and energy. The OBD-II protocol reports a subset of vehicle telemetry, and fuel consumption derived from OBD signals is an estimate based on engine load, RPM and inferred efficiency. The same number read directly from the manufacturer's API is the actual figure the vehicle's own dashboard shows — and it is materially more accurate per vehicle.

PHEV battery state from manufacturer systems. A PHEV's battery state-of-charge, charging history and electric-drive proportion live in the manufacturer's connected-car platform. An OBD dongle's view of those signals is partial and protocol-dependent; the OEM API reads them directly. For PHEV compliance specifically, this is a difference that matters.

The data quality argument, with a real example. The audit's reference vehicle — a UK fleet PHEV with a published WLTP figure of 287.2 mpg — returned 46.9 mpg in actual real-world telemetry, with the battery depleted 81% of the time across 799 readings over four months. That figure came from the manufacturer's own primary energy-level data, read directly from the OEM API. An OBD dongle could approximate fuel consumption from engine signals, but it cannot read the battery state-of-charge data that exposes the underlying compliance failure. For PHEV ESG reporting and SECR audit defence, the difference between estimated and actual is the difference between a defensible carbon report and one that does not survive scrutiny.

Native compliance on the same record. DVLA driver licence checks, MOT and tax tracking, grey fleet management, audit trail — Orbis runs them natively in the same product as the vehicle data. See fleet compliance software and the fleet intelligence platform together; Geotab handles compliance through partner integrations rather than native features.

For pricing comparison, see our fleet intelligence software pricing — Orbis's per-vehicle Intelligence tier is in the same band as Geotab's per-vehicle subscription, but with no hardware capital line.

Who should choose which

The buyer who should choose Geotab: a UK fleet operator whose primary requirement is real-time GPS tracking, dispatch, route optimisation, dashcam integration, or asset recovery — Geotab's core competencies. Also: any fleet running vehicles outside Orbis's currently supported OEM coverage where hardware coverage is the procurement constraint.

The buyer who should choose Orbis IO: a UK fleet operator whose primary requirement is data quality on real fuel and energy consumption, defensible SECR carbon reporting, PHEV compliance, EV transition planning on real-world range, or compliance and vehicle data on one record without hardware in the vehicle. The procurement decision driver is data accuracy and ESG defensibility, not real-time tracking or route management.

For some fleet operating models the answer is to run both — Geotab for the real-time and dispatch layer, Orbis for the OEM data layer underneath. The two architectures are complementary as much as they are competitive; the procurement question is which capability solves the largest unsolved problem on the fleet's roadmap.

Frequently asked questions

Is Orbis IO a Geotab alternative?

Yes for some use cases, no for others. Orbis IO is an OEM-native fleet intelligence and compliance platform — it reads vehicle data directly from manufacturer APIs, with no hardware in the vehicle. Geotab is a hardware telematics platform built around an OBD dongle that captures GPS, speed and event data. They overlap on fleet efficiency, driver behaviour and ESG reporting; they do not overlap on Geotab-only features like real-time GPS tracking, dashcam integration, and route optimisation. The right answer depends on which capability is the procurement priority.

What is the difference between OBD telematics and OEM-native fleet data?

An OBD dongle plugs into the vehicle's diagnostic port and reads what the OBD protocol exposes — GPS, speed, engine RPM, accelerometer events, and a subset of fuel consumption data inferred from engine signals. An OEM-native API reads data directly from the manufacturer's own systems — actual fuel consumption per trip, real battery state-of-charge, charging session history, predictive maintenance signals from onboard diagnostics. The OEM API is what the vehicle's own dashboard reads from; the OBD dongle is a hardware layer sitting on top. For fuel economy and PHEV compliance specifically, the OEM data is materially more accurate.

Does Orbis IO require hardware like Geotab?

No. Orbis IO connects via the manufacturer's connected-car APIs — the same systems that power the vehicle's own connected services — with no hardware in the vehicle and no OBD dongle. Geotab requires a hardware device installed in each vehicle's OBD port, typically with installation, firmware updates and replacement on a multi-year cycle. Orbis works on any vehicle from one of the 14+ supported manufacturer brands; Geotab works on any vehicle with an OBD-II port, which is broader hardware coverage but lower data quality per vehicle.

The fastest way to compare is on your real fleet. Run an Orbis Fleet Review — upload a CSV of your vehicles and we return a named, line-item review covering compliance gaps, EV transition shortlist and real efficiency scores within 48 hours. Free.

Run a free fleet review →